The first image that comes to mind when one hears the word “watch” is usually the current most popular style: the wristwatch. We forget that the first watches were hung on chains or fobs and kept in the pockets of men’s waistcoats.

It’s refreshing to see that designers are remembering that and starting to think outside the band.

A few months ago, I was looking for a necklace that would go with everything, but I also felt that I needed a watch because I was tired of rummaging in my bag for my cell phone whenever I lost track of the time (which is often).

That was when I opened VOGUE magazine to see Marc by Marc Jacobs’ ultra-chic pendant watches. It solved my accessory dilemma in a snap. I got the black resin heart on a silver chain. I’m still constantly late, but at least I look great.

Since then, I’ve seen retailers offering pendant watches, charm bracelet watches, bangle bracelet watches – it’s only a matter of time before they come in ring form. And when they do, I’m going to have to have one of those, too.

The watch is a somewhat paradoxical accessory. Most jewelry serves no purpose other than to enhance its wearer’s style or look. In fact, the more superfluous an item is, the more luxurious it seems.

The watch, however, has a practical primary use: the telling of time; the prevention of tardiness; something to glance when saying, “It’s late; I really must be going.” Judging by the inverse ratio of utility to luxury, the watch ought to be the plainest and stuffiest of accessories.

But I love the paradox of the timepiece as jewelry. Long live sensible sensations, practical luxuries, and timeless timepieces.

Watchin’ Out,

Olivia

Posted on 21.May 2008 at 16:12 in Trend Watch. Trackback-Url for this Article.